eProcureAI / Platform / For AP teams

Role

Three invoices worth opening,
not forty eight

Reading, matching and chasing are mechanical. What is left after those is the small number of genuinely ambiguous invoices, and that is the part worth a person.

Written for the people doing the work. Not for the person buying the software.

Today's queueWhat arrives
The situation

Most of the day is not accounts payable work

Ask an accounts payable team what they spend the day on and the honest answer is typing, searching and chasing. Very little of it requires an accounts payable qualification.

An invoice arrives. Somebody keys the supplier, the amount and the lines. They find the purchase order it relates to, work out whether the goods actually arrived, and either post it or start an email to somebody who might know. Repeat, several hundred times a month.

Almost all of those invoices are completely fine. The genuinely interesting ones, where a supplier has billed for more than arrived or charged a rate nobody agreed, are a small minority buried in the volume.

The checking is worth keeping

Nothing here suggests the control should be relaxed. Comparing the order, the receipt and the invoice is the single most effective thing an accounts payable function does. The problem was that doing it by hand made it expensive, so under pressure it got applied to a sample rather than everything.

When the reading and matching are automatic, the check runs on every invoice. The control gets stronger while the workload gets smaller, which is rare enough to be worth saying plainly.

And the supplier emails drop

A large share of inbound email is suppliers asking whether an invoice was received and when it will be paid. When they can see that themselves in the portal, that volume falls away without anybody doing anything.

What the day looks like

Four tasks, three of which disappear

Task 1

Keying invoice data

Supplier, amount, lines and coding, typed from a document that already contains all of it.

RemovedExtraction
1
Task 2

Finding the order

Searching for the purchase order an invoice relates to, then checking whether goods were received.

RemovedAutomatic linking
2
Task 3

Chasing internally

Emailing a receiving site to ask whether something turned up, then waiting.

RemovedThe receipt exists
3
Task 4

Deciding on the difficult ones

Where the three documents genuinely disagree and somebody has to make a call.

KeptThis is the job
4
What changes

Three differences you feel in week one

The typing stops

Extraction pulls every field, matches the supplier even when the name is written differently from your master record, and applies the coding by rule.

  • Header and line data extracted automatically
  • Supplier matched despite naming differences
  • Coding applied from your rules
  • Scans and photographs handled
Before you open itLive
FieldsExtracted
SupplierMatched
CodingApplied
Your keystrokesNone
Done before you lookNot by you

Exceptions arrive nearly solved

The expensive part of a mismatch was always the hunting. The order, the goods receipt, prior invoices from that supplier and the calculated variance are all attached before you open it.

  • Order and receipt attached to the exception
  • Variance calculated rather than worked out
  • Prior invoices from that supplier included
  • Typical resolution is a decision, not an investigation
An exceptionLive
BilledMore than received
OrderAttached
ReceiptAttached
VarianceCalculated
You doDecide
Evidence gatheredBefore it reaches you

Supplier chasing falls away

Suppliers see invoice and payment status in the portal, so the where is my payment email largely stops arriving. That is often the single biggest change to the daily inbox.

  • Suppliers see status without emailing
  • Payment dates visible to them
  • Disputes handled on the record rather than in a thread
  • Inbound query volume drops noticeably
Supplier queriesLive
StatusVisible to them
Payment dateVisible
DisputesOn the record
Inbound emailFalls
They can see itSo they stop asking
The exceptions you keep

Five cases worth a person

These are the ones where judgement is genuinely required, and each arrives with what you need to decide.

CaseWhat you seeWhat you decide
Priced differently from the orderThe difference, with the order attachedAccept the variance or dispute it
More billed than receivedThe goods receipt showing what arrivedCredit note or short pay
No purchase orderCoding suggested from similar invoicesApprove the coding or change it
Possible duplicateThe original invoice alongside itConfirm or release
Unreadable documentThe original attachedKey it manually or request a resend

Everything else clears without reaching you, which is what makes it possible to look at these five properly.

Month end

Six things that stop being a scramble

Accruals

Built rather than assembled

From open commitments and goods received but not invoiced, both of which already exist in the system.

BuiltAutomatically
Ageing

Live rather than produced

Available whenever anybody looks instead of being run as a report at a point in time.

AvailableContinuously
Unmatched items

Visible during the month

Rather than surfacing on the last day when there is no time to resolve them.

VisibleAll month
Supplier statements

Reconciled against a clean ledger

Because credits and replacements stayed attached to the orders they relate to.

Net positionAccurate
Cut off

Clear rather than argued

Goods receipt dates are recorded at the dock, so what belongs in the period is a fact.

DatedAt receipt
Predictability

The same every month

Which is what makes the close plannable rather than an event people brace for.

ConsistentMonth to month
Who does what

The short version of your day

The control gets stronger and the workload gets smaller, which is not a trade off you usually get offered.

What you do

Decide on the genuinely ambiguous invoices, and manage the supplier relationships that need a person.

The human partLive
Review exceptionsWith evidence attached
Decide on variancesAccept or dispute
Handle disputesOn the record
Release the payment runOn your terms
A handfulRather than everything

What eProcureAI does

Reading, matching, coding, holding and chasing, on every invoice rather than a sample.

The automatic partLive
Read the invoiceAny format
Match the supplierDespite spelling
Compare three documentsLine by line
Hold what should be heldDuplicates and missing receipts
Schedule the clean onesWithin your terms
Every invoiceNot a sample
0checked against order and receipt rather than a sample
0order, receipt and variance on every exception
0accruals from open commitments at month end
0supplier chasing once they can see status
FAQ

Questions people actually ask

Will this replace our accounts payable team?
Not in any deployment we have seen. What changes is what the team spends the day on, moving from keying and searching to handling exceptions and supplier relationships. Most teams redeploy rather than reduce.
What happens to invoices without a purchase order?
They route through an approval flow you define, with coding suggested from how similar invoices were treated before, and the same audit trail applied.
Do we still control the payment run?
Yes. Scheduling happens within your approved terms and approval rules, and the payment run itself remains yours to release.
How are duplicates caught?
Exact duplicates are blocked outright. Near duplicates, usually the same invoice under a slightly different supplier name, are flagged with the original attached so you can confirm quickly.
Can it handle a photograph of a paper invoice?
Yes. Scans and phone photos are handled, and a document that genuinely cannot be read goes to a person with the original attached rather than being guessed at.
What about credit notes and short deliveries?
Both stay linked to the order they relate to, so the net position on a supplier is always accurate rather than reconstructed at year end.
How does month end change?
Accruals build from open commitments and goods received but not invoiced, ageing is live, and unmatched items are visible during the month rather than on the last day.
Will our messiest supplier work?
Probably, though the honest answer is to test it. Send a stack of real invoices including the difficult ones and we will run them on the call.

Send us a day of real invoices

Including the ones that cause arguments. We will run them live rather than describe what should happen.

Book your free demo

Related: All solutions and AP Automation